The $\Gamma$-sets and $\zeta$-space.

Assume $X$ is a smooth convex open manifold and $\partial X$ is a convex regular polytope.

Def: An *$\mathcal F$-completion,* or *foliational completion* of a *block*, $\mathcal B:=X\cup\partial X$ over its vertex set $V$, is $\mathscr CX_V:=\cup_{v_{ij}\in V} \mathcal F_{v_{ij}}$ where $i,j$ index the vertices. 

Example: Set $X=(0,1)^n$. Take a smooth foliation $\mathcal F$ for every pair of points $v_i,v_j\in \partial X=[0,1]^n-(0,1)^n$ satisfying $\mathrm{sup~dist}_n(v_i,v_j)=\sqrt{r}$. Let the leaves in each $\mathcal F$ be mutually diffeomorphic to the class $M=(0,\sqrt{n})\times S^{n-2}$ accumulating to $v_i,v_j$. We see that $r=\lbrace 1,\sqrt{n} \rbrace.$ Allowing only $r=\sqrt{n}$, we can look at sections of $\mathscr CX_V$:

Def: A $\Gamma$-set on $\mathscr CX_V$ is the union of all leaf intersections of the foliations i.e. 

$$\Gamma_{n}:= \lbrace \mathcal (\mathcal F_1 \cap \mathcal F_2)\cup (\mathcal F_2 \cap \mathcal F_3) \cup (\mathcal F_3 \cap \mathcal F_4) \cup \cdot\cdot\cdot \cup (\mathcal F_{n-1} \cap \mathcal F_{n})  \rbrace.$$

Then it follows trivially that for any given foliation, $\Gamma_1=X^1=(0,1)$ and $\Gamma_2=X^2=(0,1)^2$. 

>What is $\Gamma_3$ equal to?

It seems that $\Gamma_3$ is equal to three mutually orthogonal planes but I want some reassurance that this is true. I don't know the structure of the $\Gamma$-sets for $n>3$.

The following is meant to provide context as to why I am defining these concepts above in the first place:

Personally I am interested in the $\Gamma$-sets because if you define vector fields on elements of the $M$-class, you can add the vectors along sections of the $\Gamma$-sets resulting in vector bundles that alternate orientation when traveling along a path on the $\Gamma$-set. Thus the $\Gamma$-sets tell you about the geometry.

Another reason I'm interested in the construction in general is because one inherits a notion of decay with $\mathscr CX_V$. Specifically, the $M$-class rapidly decays to zero when traveling in the direction prescribed by the vector fields placed on the $M$-class. This can be formalized analogous to rapid decay of elements of the Schwartz space $\mathcal S(\Bbb R^n)$, which are functions, not surfaces. However it is not difficult to adapt this notion.

With this rapid decay we have a concept of a Schwartz space which plays nice with zeta functions because it is known that we can build zeta functions from elements in the Schwartz space.

   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Automorphisms and zeta space

Image
Here I will operate under the assumption that $\phi_s$ is a unique and well-posed solution to the following PDE. This means whatever conditions are needed for that to occur, will be imposed. $$s\frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2}\phi_s(x)=\mp x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi_s(x) $$ for which we have our pre-assigned unique solution: $$\mathcal \phi_{s}:=\bigg\lbrace e^{\frac{\pm s}{\log x}}:s \in \Bbb R \bigg\rbrace$$ We have singularities at $s=0$ and $x=0,1$ and this will be called a "cross singularity" or  $CS$. A natural idea would be to intialize some distribution on this $CS$ and run time forward giving a wellposed analytic solution for all time. So we choose our pre-assigned solution $\phi_s$ and run the solution back in time where we obtain what we wanted, at least qualitatively. We can throw out our solution for $s<0$ because it doesn't directly apply to the situation, and it does not rapidly decay. Meanwhile, for $s>0$ it is Schwartz i.e. has a rapid decay cr
Read more

Gluing leaves in zeta space and automorphisms on the resulting quotient spaces

Define an analytic planar homotopy $h_t: (0,1) \to (0,1)$ for $t\in[1/3,3]$ where $h_t(x)=e^{\frac{t}{\log x}}$ s.t. $h_{1/3}=e^{\frac{1/3}{\log x}}$ and $h_3=e^{\frac{3}{\log x}}$ for $x\in(0,1)$. I want a rotational homotopy that projects onto the planar homotopy. So, define the equivalence relation on the boundary curves of the closed subset of $(0,1)^2$, that is $h_{1/3}\sim h_3$, where points are identified by straight lines with slope $1$, connecting $h_{1/3}$ and $h_3$. This yields a spherical topology $\mathcal S$ embedded in $(0,1)^3$ with the endpoints of the sphere being singularities at $p=(0,1,1)$ and $q=(1,0,0)$.  Conceptually it's clear that a projection $\pi: (0,1)^3 \to (0,1)^2$ takes the leaves on $\mathcal S$ to $h_t(x)$ as a double cover. But my main objective of study is to put a metric on $\mathcal S$. The $1$-parameter metric I derived on the planar space is $g_t(r)=\int_{(0,1)} x^{r-1}h_t(x)~dx = 2\sqrt{\frac{t}{r}}K_1(2\sqrt{tr})$ and it measures the distan
Read more

A description of $\zeta-$space

Image
I would like to attempt to define a mathematical space I call $\zeta-$space.  $\zeta-$space has a description as the transversal intersection of two isometric pseudo-Riemannian manifolds (Lorentzian submanifolds) both equipped with the Lorentz metric. It is somewhat laborious to describe and derive $\zeta$ because it is not a standard approach and $\zeta$ does not have a clean representation so to speak. However it is a fundamentally important mathematical and physical object in its own right and should be studied. I define $\zeta$ in the following way: $\zeta:=\{\varphi_S \} \cap \{ \varphi_T \}$ Under this first level description, $\zeta$ is the intersection between two class structures denoted as $\varphi_S$ and $\varphi_T.$ These class structures can be thought of as a family of functions and also as lines of constant time and constant space respectively: $$ \varphi_S(x) = e^{\frac{S}{\log(x)}} $$ $$ \varphi_T(x) = e^{\frac{T}{\log(1-x)}}$$ Here I view $S,T$ as fundamen
Read more