The Geometry of the Delta Groupoid
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
This post serves to marry the last three posts into one cohesive framework. The connection to foliational completions is also made clear.
Enriched Graphs and Delta Groupoid
Let $\Gamma = (V, E)$ be a finite connected tailless regular planar graph or multigraph, embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$. Define an enrichment of $\Gamma$ to be a triple:
$$\mathcal{X} = (\phi, \mathcal{L}, \rho)$$
where:
- $\phi: E \to \mathcal{C}$ is a coloring or stratification into a finite set of colors $\mathcal{C}$,
- $\mathcal{L}$ is a local system (functor from the path groupoid of $\Gamma$ to $\mathrm{Vect}_k$), assumed flat,
- $\rho: \pi_1(\Gamma) \to \mathrm{Aut}(\mathcal{L})$ is a holonomy representation.
Let $\mathcal{E}_\Gamma$ denote the set of all such enrichments.
Define the Delta groupoid $\mathcal{D}_\Gamma$ as follows:
- Objects: enrichments $\mathcal{X} \in \mathcal{E}_\Gamma$.
- Morphisms: invertible maps
$$\delta: (\phi, \mathcal{L}, \rho) \longrightarrow (\phi', \mathcal{L}', \rho')$$
satisfying:
- The underlying graph $\Gamma$ is fixed:
$$Z_\Gamma(u) = Z_{\delta(\Gamma)}(u)$$
- The coloring transforms via pullback:
$$\phi' = \delta^* \phi$$
- The local system transforms functorially:
$$\mathcal{L}' = \delta^* \mathcal{L}, \quad \rho' = \rho \circ \delta_*$$
- Composition: $(\delta_2 \circ \delta_1)(\mathcal{X}) = \delta_2(\delta_1(\mathcal{X}))$.
- Each object has an identity, and morphisms are invertible.
Morphisms $\delta$ preserve $Z_{\Gamma}(u)$ but generally do not preserve $\phi$, $\mathcal{L}$, or $\rho$. Thus, $\delta$ encodes invariance of cycle structure and variance of enrichment data.
Given $\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{X}' \in \mathcal{E}_\Gamma$ with $\delta(\mathcal{X}) = \mathcal{X}'$, an important question is:
$$H^1(\Gamma, \mathcal{L}) \cong H^1(\Gamma, \mathcal{L}') \quad \text{?}$$
Suppose:
- $\delta$ is a geometric Delta morphism (e.g., rotation about $z=0$),
- $\Gamma \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ lies in $z=0$ plane,
- $\delta$ acts as an automorphism of $\Gamma$ and $\mathcal{L}$ preserving flatness.
Then:
$$\rho \simeq \rho \circ \delta_*, \quad H^1(\Gamma, \mathcal{L}) \cong H^1(\Gamma, \delta^*\mathcal{L}).$$
Such $\delta$ form a distinguished subgroupoid preserving the full enrichment.
Foliational Completions and the Interface Structure.
Let $X$ be a smooth, open, geodesically convex $n$-dimensional manifold with regular polytope boundary, and $V = \{v_i\}$ a finite set of vertices.
Define the block:
$$\mathcal{B} := X \cup \partial X$$
A foliational completion (or $\mathcal{F}$-completion) is given by foliations $\mathcal{F}_{v_{ij}}$ for each distinct pair $(v_i, v_j)$, satisfying:
$$\lim_{p \to \partial X} L_\alpha(p) = \{v_i, v_j\}$$
for leaves $L_\alpha$ of $\mathcal{F}_{v_{ij}}$.
The $\mathcal{F}$-completion is:
$$CX_V := \bigcup_{(v_i, v_j) \in V \times V} \mathcal{F}_{v_{ij}}$$
The Interface Structure $\mathcal{I}$
Inside $CX_V$ in dimension $n=3$, define $\mathcal{I}$ as the union of four symmetrical maximal surfaces of revolution inside the unit cube, each having constant Gaussian curvature.
Slicing $\mathcal{I}$ with planes $x_1, x_2, x_3 = 1/2$ yields two overlapping oval curves per slice, with intersections forming pieces of the graph $\Gamma$.
Thus, $\mathcal{I}$ geometrically generates $\Gamma$, tying together the foliational and graph-based frameworks.
Summary
The enriched Delta groupoid $\mathcal{D}_\Gamma$ and the foliational Interface $\mathcal{I}$ are intertwined:
- $\mathcal{I}$ provides a natural geometric source of $\Gamma$,
- $\mathcal{D}_\Gamma$ captures symmetries, preserving cycle structure but transforming local systems and cohomology.
Together, they describe a system where coarse spectral data remains invariant while finer enrichment data evolves under geometric transformations.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment