Collapse-Driven Gauge Synchronization over $\Bbb Z^2$.

-

To begin formally laying the groundwork for $\zeta$-space we must revisit the spectral tower. To each $\mathcal F$-completion in dimension $n$, we can take a symmetrical subset $\mathcal I^{(n-1)}$ and enrich these objects with bundles restricted to skeletons. In dimension $n=3$ we have $\mathcal I^{(3-1)}$ and we take line bundles restricted to $\Gamma$ from which we then can associate an Ihara zeta function to $\Gamma$, which may be twisted. 

Then we will define $\zeta$-space, or $\zeta^n$ as the space where we associate copies of $\mathcal I^{(n-1)}$ to an integer lattice, $\Bbb Z^n \subset \Bbb R^n$. A lot of work must be done from here but the benefits of this work will be very useful theoretically as well as for applications.

Essentially we introduce the spectral tower to classify all the elements which will then be assigned to lattice sites. 

Let $\zeta^n$ denote the zeta-structured lattice space:

$$\zeta^n := \left\{ z \mapsto \left( \mathcal{I}^{(n-1)}_z,\ \mathcal{L}_z|_{\Gamma_z},\ \zeta_{\Gamma_z}^{\rho_z} \right) \,\middle|\, z \in \mathbb{Z}^n \right\}$$

where:

- $\mathcal{I}^{(n-1)}_z$ is a stratified complex embedded at site $z$

- $\Gamma_z \subset \mathcal{I}^{(n-1)}_z$ is its 1-skeleton

- $\mathcal{L}_z$ is a line bundle restricted to $\Gamma_z$

- $\rho_z : \pi_1(\Gamma_z) \to G$ is a holonomy representation (possibly twisted)

- $\zeta_{\Gamma_z}^{\rho_z}$ is the associated (possibly twisted) Ihara zeta function


Now we consider a lattice-based dynamical system indexed by $\mathbb{Z}^2$, where each site $(m,n) \in \mathbb{Z}^2$ is associated with a twisted Ihara zeta function

$$\mathcal{Z}_{m,n}(u) := \zeta_{\Gamma}(u, \rho_{m,n}),$$

where $\rho_{m,n} \in \mathrm{Rep}(\pi_1(\Gamma), G)$ is a holonomy representation of a fixed $4$-regular connected planar graph $\Gamma$ with $\mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma) \cong D_4$.


A $\Bbb Z^2$ slice of $\zeta^3$ where each element is associated to a lattice site.



Each $\rho_{m,n}$ is not fixed, but exists in a formal superposition over a finite orbit of twisted configurations:

$$\rho_{m,n} \in \mathbb{C}[\mathrm{Orb}_{\Psi}(\rho_0)] \quad \text{where } \Psi \in D_4 \text{ acts by internal partial reattachments of local strata}.$$


The group $D_4$ is realized internally at each site via four elementary partial permutations:

$$\Psi_T = (1\ 2), \quad \Psi_B = (3\ 4), \quad \Psi_L = (1\ 3), \quad \Psi_R = (2\ 4),$$

where the numbers correspond to quadrant positions NW (1), NE (2), SW (3), SE (4). These generators act as transpositions on the internal labels of a quadrant-colored square and collectively generate $D_4$ by composition.


Each site holds a state 

    $$\tilde{\rho}_{m,n} \in \mathbb{C}[\mathrm{Orb}_{\Psi}(\rho_0)],$$

representing a formal linear combination over all twisted configurations under the $D_4$ action. Observing a specific site $(m_0, n_0)$ collapses the state:

    $$\tilde{\rho}_{m_0, n_0} \longrightarrow \rho_{m_0, n_0} = g_* \cdot \rho_0,$$

where $g_* \in D_4$ is the observed local configuration. All other lattice sites update their configuration to match $g_* \cdot \rho_0$ using a discrete local rule:

    $$\rho_{m,n}(t+1) = \Psi_i \cdot \rho_{m,n}(t) \quad \text{if } d_{\mathrm{Cayley}}(\Psi_i \cdot g_{m,n}(t), g_*) < d_{\mathrm{Cayley}}(g_{m,n}(t), g_*),$$ 

where $g_{m,n}(t) \in D_4$ encodes the local state at time $t$.










Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to the $\mathcal F$-completion, the Interface construction and the Gamma set

-
Image
I'll start off with a definition that might initially sound pretty abstract and maybe confusing. The point in defining things as I do is to make our lives easier later on. The goal is to focus on a symmetrical subspace of what I'll call the $\mathcal F$-completion. This subspace is called $\mathcal I$. So let's begin: Let $X$ be a smooth, open, geodesically convex $n$-dimensional manifold with regular polytope boundary, and let $V = \{v_i\}$ be a finite set of vertices in $\partial X$. A block is defined as $\mathcal{B} := X \cup \partial X$, where $\partial X$ denotes the boundary. A foliational completion (or $\mathcal{F}$-completion) of a block $\mathcal{B}$ is a structure obtained by extending foliations to accumulate at specific vertices in the boundary. Formally, for each pair of distinct vertices $(v_i, v_j) \in V \times V$, there exists a foliation $\mathcal{F}_{v_{ij}}$, whose leaves accumulate at $v_i$ and $v_j$. The $\mathcal{F}$-completion is the union of these ...
Read more

Grothendieck Site over the Spectral Tower

-
Sheaf Stack over the Dimensional Stratification Site We define a stratified site $\mathcal{S}$ indexed by dimension $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 2}$, whose objects are geometric-combinatorial models $\mathcal{I}^{(n)}$ associated to dimension-$n$ F-completions. Morphisms in this site correspond to boundary inclusions, coordinate projections, and degenerations between dimensions: $$\mathcal{I}^{(n)} \to \mathcal{I}^{(n-1)} \quad \text{via coordinate slice or foliation boundary}.$$ Let $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)}$ denote the moduli space of $\Delta$-twisted holonomy representations in dimension $n$, with $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)} = \mathrm{U}(1)^r / \Delta$ the classical representation torus quotient. We define a sheaf stack of zeta data over $\mathcal{S}$: $$\mathscr{Z} : \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{op}} \longrightarrow \mathbf{Stacks}$$ such that: For each $n$, $\mathscr{Z}(\mathcal{I}^{(n)})$ is a stack (e.g. derived or topological) encoding the family of zeta sheaves over $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)}...
Read more

Automorphisms and zeta space

-
Image
Here I will operate under the assumption that $\phi_s$ is a unique and well-posed solution to the following PDE. This means whatever conditions are needed for that to occur, will be imposed. $$s\frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2}\phi_s(x)=\mp x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi_s(x) $$ for which we have our pre-assigned unique solution: $$\mathcal \phi_{s}:=\bigg\lbrace e^{\frac{\pm s}{\log x}}:s \in \Bbb R \bigg\rbrace$$ We have singularities at $s=0$ and $x=0,1$ and this will be called a "cross singularity" or  $CS$. A natural idea would be to intialize some distribution on this $CS$ and run time forward giving a wellposed analytic solution for all time. So we choose our pre-assigned solution $\phi_s$ and run the solution back in time where we obtain what we wanted, at least qualitatively. We can throw out our solution for $s<0$ because it doesn't directly apply to the situation, and it does not rapidly decay. Meanwhile, for $s>0$ it is Schwartz i.e. has a rapid decay cr...
Read more