Stratified Holonomy Dynamics of the Ihara Zeta function of $\Gamma$

Let $\Gamma$ be a finite connected graph (e.g., the 1-skeleton of a stratified space or foliated complex), and let $\mathcal{R}$ denote the stratified space of holonomy representations:

$$\mathcal{R} = \bigsqcup_{G \subseteq GL_n(\mathbb{C})} \mathcal{R}_G,\quad \mathcal{R}_G := \left\{ \rho : \pi_1(\Gamma) \to G \right\}.$$


Each stratum $\mathcal{R}_G$ corresponds to a distinct choice of structure group $G$, such as $U(1)$, $SU(2)$, or  $GL_n(\mathbb{C})$.


Define a stratified holonomy evolution governed by a sequence of generalized symmetry transformations


$$\Psi_k : \mathcal{R}_{G_k} \longrightarrow \mathcal{R}_{G_{k+1}},$$


which may be continuous or discrete, invertible or not, and may preserve or enhance the structure group.


The evolution of representations is given by the discrete recurrence:


$$\rho_{k+1} = \Psi_k(\rho_k), \qquad \rho_k \in \mathcal{R}_{G_k},\; \rho_{k+1} \in \mathcal{R}_{G_{k+1}}.$$


This defines a dynamical system over the stratified moduli space $\mathcal{R}$, where transitions between strata correspond to changes in the structure group, such as:


$$U(1) \longrightarrow GL_2(\mathbb{C}) \longrightarrow GL_3(\mathbb{C}) \longrightarrow \cdots$$


or possibly to reductions:


$$GL_n(\mathbb{C}) \longrightarrow U(1).$$


Associated to each $\rho_k$, we define a (possibly twisted) Ihara-type zeta function:


$$\zeta_k(u) := \prod_{[p]} \det\left( I - \rho_k(p) u^{\ell(p)} \right)^{-1},$$


where the product is over equivalence classes of primitive closed paths $[p]$ in $\Gamma$, and $\ell(p)$ is the length of the path.


The evolution of zeta invariants under $\Psi_k$ is given by the pushforward:


$$\zeta_{k+1}(u) = \Psi_{k*}\left( \zeta_k(u) \right),$$


which reflects any change in the spectral type or determinant structure induced by the transformation of the holonomy representation.


This framework allows for discrete-time dynamics across the space of representations and zeta functions, capturing both internal deformations (when $G_{k+1} = G_k$) and structural enhancements (when $G_{k+1} \supsetneq G_k$) driven by the generalized symmetry $\Psi_k$.

Comments

  1. This is quite interesting. Looking forward to the next post

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks - my goal is to post 2-3 times per week :)

      Delete
  2. Is \Gamma the same as in previous posts? Is it arbitrary or fixed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes good question. \Gamma is fixed to be the intersection locii of the canonical \mathcal I stratified complex (see previous posts for that), with x,y,z=0 coordinate planes. In some posts I constructed \mathcal I in X^3=[0,1]^3 but it can easily be rescaled to the more accessible [-1,1]^3=Y^3. In theory \Gamma and \mathcal I could generalize but I haven't thought about that much.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to the $\mathcal F$-completion, the Interface construction and the Gamma set

Grothendieck Site over the Spectral Tower

Delta Groupoid Associated to an Enriched Graph