The Spectral Tower of Zeta Moduli

-

 Let $\Gamma$ be a finite connected graph (or multigraph) with first Betti number $r = \beta_1(\Gamma)$, and let $\Delta \subset \mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma)$ be a finite subgroup of automorphisms acting on $\pi_1(\Gamma)$ via pullback.

Let $\mathcal{M}_\Delta := \mathrm{U}(1)^r / \Delta$ denote the moduli space of flat unitary representations of $\pi_1(\Gamma)$ up to $\Delta$-symmetry — equivalently, the moduli space of holonomy classes for $\mathrm{U}(1)$-bundles twisted by $\Delta$.

Suppose further that there exists a stratified geometric object $\mathcal{I} \subseteq [-1,1]^3$, constructed from $\Gamma$ and $\Delta$, encoding topological, singular, or foliation-theoretic data derived from $\Gamma$ and its symmetries. For example, $\mathcal{I}$ may arise as a cone-singular surface with corners or as a compactification of a flow space determined by $\Gamma$.

Spectral Moduli Duality Conjecture: There exists a natural equivalence of orbifolds (or derived stacks)

$$\mathcal{M}_\Delta \cong \mathcal{I},$$

such that the zeta sheaf

$$\mathcal{Z}_\Gamma : \mathcal{M}_\Delta \to \mathbb{C}[[u]]$$

pulls back to a sheaf of spectral invariants over $\mathcal{I}$ whose local structure reflects the singularities, foliations, and holonomy patterns present in $\mathcal{I}$.

This equivalence is equivariant with respect to the $\Delta$-action and intertwines representation-theoretic symmetries on $\mathcal{M}_\Delta$ with geometric symmetries of $\mathcal{I}$.

Dimensional Tower of Spectral-Geometric Duality

Let $\Gamma$ be a connected 4-regular multigraph equipped with a finite symmetry group $\Delta \subset \mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma)$ acting on its edge set and on $\pi_1(\Gamma)$. As previously discussed, this action lifts to a pullback action on the moduli torus $\mathrm{U}(1)^r$, leading to the moduli orbifold

$$\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)} := \mathrm{U}(1)^r / \Delta,$$

where $r = \beta_1(\Gamma)$. The twisted Ihara zeta function

$$\mathcal{Z}_\Gamma : \mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)} \to \mathbb{C}[[u]]$$

defines a sheaf of spectral invariants over this space.

Now, suppose there exists a stratified geometric space $\mathcal{I} \subset [-1,1]^3$ (the "$\mathcal{I}$-structure''), which is:

  1. a 3-dimensional extension or "coordinate slice'' of a 4-dimensional object (a subset of an F-completion}),
  2. equipped with an induced $\Delta$-action compatible with its geometric and combinatorial structure,
  3. such that $\mathcal{I}$ encodes a surface foliation or flow model associated to $\Gamma$.

Then, we postulate that $\mathcal{I}$ serves as a geometric realization of the same moduli-theoretic information as $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)}$, but lifted into higher dimension. More generally, we posit the existence of a tower of spectral-geometric structures indexed by dimension:

$$\begin{array}{cccccc} n = 2 &\rightsquigarrow& \Gamma &\rightsquigarrow& \mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)} = \mathrm{U}(1)^r / \Delta \\ n = 3 &\rightsquigarrow& \mathcal{I} &\rightsquigarrow& \mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(3)} \cong \mathcal{I} \\ n = 4 &\rightsquigarrow& \widehat{\mathcal{I}} &\rightsquigarrow& \mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(4)} \\ \vdots & & \vdots & & \vdots \\\end{array}$$

Here:

  1. $\widehat{\mathcal{I}}$ denotes the special subset of the F-completion: a 4-dimensional object whose coordinate slice at $z = 0$ yields $\mathcal{I}$,
  2. Each $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)}$ is a moduli space of twisted holonomy data in dimension $n$, possibly interpreted as a quotient of a higher torus,
  3. Each layer supports a delta symmetry action, and the zeta sheaf lifts coherently along the tower.

Dimensional Tower Duality

There exists a functorial correspondence

$$\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)} \cong \mathcal{I}^{(n)},$$

between moduli spaces of delta-equivariant spectral data and geometric-combinatorial objects $\mathcal{I}^{(n)}$, defined inductively as coordinate slices or boundary degenerations of an $n$-dimensional F-completion.

This tower is compatible with:

  1. Delta actions at each level,
  2. Zeta sheaves varying holonomically across dimensions,
  3. Intersectional structure between different $\mathcal{I}^{(n)}$ along coordinate planes,
  4. A unifying stratified graph structure enriched by foliation singularities.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An introduction to the $\mathcal F$-completion, the Interface construction and the Gamma set

-
Image
I'll start off with a definition that might initially sound pretty abstract and maybe confusing. The point in defining things as I do is to make our lives easier later on. The goal is to focus on a symmetrical subspace of what I'll call the $\mathcal F$-completion. This subspace is called $\mathcal I$. So let's begin: Let $X$ be a smooth, open, geodesically convex $n$-dimensional manifold with regular polytope boundary, and let $V = \{v_i\}$ be a finite set of vertices in $\partial X$. A block is defined as $\mathcal{B} := X \cup \partial X$, where $\partial X$ denotes the boundary. A foliational completion (or $\mathcal{F}$-completion) of a block $\mathcal{B}$ is a structure obtained by extending foliations to accumulate at specific vertices in the boundary. Formally, for each pair of distinct vertices $(v_i, v_j) \in V \times V$, there exists a foliation $\mathcal{F}_{v_{ij}}$, whose leaves accumulate at $v_i$ and $v_j$. The $\mathcal{F}$-completion is the union of these ...
Read more

Grothendieck Site over the Spectral Tower

-
Sheaf Stack over the Dimensional Stratification Site We define a stratified site $\mathcal{S}$ indexed by dimension $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 2}$, whose objects are geometric-combinatorial models $\mathcal{I}^{(n)}$ associated to dimension-$n$ F-completions. Morphisms in this site correspond to boundary inclusions, coordinate projections, and degenerations between dimensions: $$\mathcal{I}^{(n)} \to \mathcal{I}^{(n-1)} \quad \text{via coordinate slice or foliation boundary}.$$ Let $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)}$ denote the moduli space of $\Delta$-twisted holonomy representations in dimension $n$, with $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(2)} = \mathrm{U}(1)^r / \Delta$ the classical representation torus quotient. We define a sheaf stack of zeta data over $\mathcal{S}$: $$\mathscr{Z} : \mathcal{S}^{\mathrm{op}} \longrightarrow \mathbf{Stacks}$$ such that: For each $n$, $\mathscr{Z}(\mathcal{I}^{(n)})$ is a stack (e.g. derived or topological) encoding the family of zeta sheaves over $\mathcal{M}_\Delta^{(n)}...
Read more

Automorphisms and zeta space

-
Image
Here I will operate under the assumption that $\phi_s$ is a unique and well-posed solution to the following PDE. This means whatever conditions are needed for that to occur, will be imposed. $$s\frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2}\phi_s(x)=\mp x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi_s(x) $$ for which we have our pre-assigned unique solution: $$\mathcal \phi_{s}:=\bigg\lbrace e^{\frac{\pm s}{\log x}}:s \in \Bbb R \bigg\rbrace$$ We have singularities at $s=0$ and $x=0,1$ and this will be called a "cross singularity" or  $CS$. A natural idea would be to intialize some distribution on this $CS$ and run time forward giving a wellposed analytic solution for all time. So we choose our pre-assigned solution $\phi_s$ and run the solution back in time where we obtain what we wanted, at least qualitatively. We can throw out our solution for $s<0$ because it doesn't directly apply to the situation, and it does not rapidly decay. Meanwhile, for $s>0$ it is Schwartz i.e. has a rapid decay cr...
Read more